|
|
Web safe: the name is slightly misleading. First because most modern browsers can display the millions of possible RGB colors. Second, and more important to this post, because the word safe carries a connotation that web-safe can’t quite live up to. Safe implies that everyone can equally use the colors without any adverse consequences. For the less than 1% of the population with certain types of color blindness, there are very real consequences. Below are three images that give representations of how people with three types of color blindness might see the subtractive CMYK and additive RGB colors. (It is important to note that these images are just representations meant to illustrate a point, they are not meant to serve as a basis for planning color schemes or answer those philosophical questions about whether the red I see it the red you see.) The most common type, called dueteranopia, means greens and reds are almost indistinguishable:
The other two, which are rarer, are protanopia and tritanopia respectively: The other two, rarer, are protanopia and tritanopia respectively:
![]() ![]() Now as technical communicators we have an obligation to provide the same information, both written and visual, to all potential users. I can think of two ways that a design could hinder someone with one of these forms of color blindness:
If you can think of additional ways technical communicators should accommodate for color blindness, we would love to hear them. |
Cool stuff… I’ll definitely have to keep this in mind the next time I design a site. I tend to always use black/white for text since you can never really go wrong with it, but I’ll pay special attention to this in the future.